Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a248b438982bc235

Jump to content

Talk:Keith Packard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Comte0 in topic Notability

Deletion?

[edit]

I'm not trying to be mean, but does this guy really deserve his own wikipedia article? The subject seems to be less than encyclopedic. Should we delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.34.226 (talk) 05:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


You don't seem to realize the amount of work he's done for the free software movement ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.21.86 (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I vote for deletion, sounds more like his resume than a encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.179.145 (talk) 17:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Definitely not. The subject is a notable figure in the free software community. (Ignorance by one anonymous passer-by does not mean a lack of notability.) Yes, this stub could be expanded to make it more encyclopedic and more interesting; that's an orthogonal question.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.113.136.219 (talk) 03:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Keith Packard / Hewlett Packard

[edit]

Mention if Keith Packard is related to the founders of Hewlett Packard or not. Jidanni (talk) 14:19, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notability

[edit]

This article need more independent reliable sources to show that this person meets WP:GNG. --Dom from Paris (talk) 13:14, 24 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

The {{Notability}} tag has been removed by Gwolf, I agree with him and 140.113.136.219 above: he is notable by himself to all people who happen to be aware of Linux and UNIX history. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 12:26, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Reply