Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26b70034a9721ca

Jump to content

Talk:Kate Nambiar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 06:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

    • Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by Sleepytimecat (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Sleepytimecat (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • Comment: Is the year needed in the hook? Also, the details about the differences between the two HIV storylines (the relatively recent one that Nambiar worked on and the original 1991 story) is the most interesting thing of all, and creating a hook about that would be incredible. Viriditas (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - Primary source
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: article is good and spotcheck checked out. The hook is currently only cited to a primary source (an opinion piece where she states she worked on it), and while it is almost certainly true, it is not verifiable. Is there a secondary source which says she worked on it (there's one that says THT worked on it). @Sleepytimecat: 1brianm7 (talk) 18:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment: @1brianm7: Cheers for having a look over it! You're right, just had a nosy though and have managed to add an additional NHS reference that mentions she worked with the Eastenders team.

Sleepytimecat (talk) 18:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ok cool, the hook is approved. 1brianm7 (talk) 01:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)Reply