Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24b5daf884d6102

Jump to content

Talk:Kate Bingham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dan88888 in topic Poorly sourced critisism

Criticism

[edit]

There is currently nothing about problems about any potential conflict of interest (I wrote something else before, but just edited this, as I think a 'potential conflict of interest ' is a more fair description than the prior one I used). I do not want to contribute to rumour mongering either, so I will not be much more specific, but there have been reports "in the www" recently pertaining to payment and expenditures in this regard, respectively from 2020 (PR consultants and the vaccination issue for example). However had, wikipedia right now has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about this at all, not even any mention at all whatsoever. I understand that wikipedia has to be objective, but it really should at the least mention this somewhere in the main article. 2A02:8388:1602:6D80:FA9F:8D5F:B40F:A65A (talk) 16:12, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you find a credible source reporting the possible conflict of interest, then we can include it. We can't inlcude your opinion. Dan88888 (talk) 09:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Poorly sourced critisism

[edit]

There are two critisisms of her in the article that point to articles in The Times or Sunday Times. She denies the truth of these. They were possibly just leaks from Dominic Cummings with no shred of truth intended to dicredit her. The fact that a newspaper reported the "Government source" is not the same thing as evidence something is true. I suggest we remove these allegations unless and until a more credible source is found, as is appropriate under BLP guidelines. Any objections? Dan88888 (talk) 09:14, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ok, then consensus is to remove this. Dan88888 (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply