Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ffeb06e270abb

Jump to content

Talk:Karamagara Bridge

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Gun Powder Ma in topic Pointed arch

Pointed arch

[edit]

The claim of the bridge using pointed arch is dubious, the arch clearly looks eliptical or apse or parabolic.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.211.98.231 (talk) 07:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Definitely not. Parabolic arches are a modern invention, and they look very differently. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 00:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Upon rereading on the subject, I noticed that same scholars designate these early 'pitched' bricks vaults such as the one of the palace at Ktesiphon or at the granaries of the Ramesseum in Luxor as elliptical or parabolic. Be it as it may these were invariably constructed of (usually unbaked) bricks whose specific properties could give them their peculiar shape in some cases. The arch of the Karamagara Bridge, however, is made of voussoir stones and for arches that use this method of construction, there is no evidence of a building tradition that employs elliptical or parabolic arches until, historically speaking, recent times. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 01:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply