Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
Commercially unavailable. Even though five working prototypes were made and demo'd, including an appearance on kids tv programme Saturday Superstore there are basically no details about the device available- indeed there are no photos of any of the prototypes on the Internet! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.217.177 (talk) 14:36, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The US Patent lists a co-inventor of the "Portable Data Processing and Storage System" named James S. Campbell of London. The Kramer article does not mention him. What were Campbell and Kramer's respective roles? Also, the article says Kramer's employer held some influence over non-renewal of the patent, but the US Patent indicates no assignment to a company. Was Campbell a supervisor, or investor? --Blainster (talk) 02:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The article makes a legal claim--that the subject of the article had prior art on an invention--that is not adequately supported by the tabloid newspaper cited in the references. If the claim is true, there should be a better source. If the claim is false, it does not belong on Wikipedia in an article about a living person, which implicitly brings up legal claims against other living persons. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 15:35, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
There seems to be plenty of book sources (including a New Scientist article) and scholar results confirming the basic facts. I am going to remove the banner dispute template, if there are specific sentences still in dispute these should be tagged individually. SpinningSpark11:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
