Talk:Kaludah

New article

New article created from various sources as noted in article, including from Register of Australian and New Zealand Ships and Boats 2021, courtesy of Mori Flapan. --Merbabu (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:46, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

Kaludah in Sydney Cove

• ... that Kaludah was a two-year old ferry on Sydney Harbour that was destroyed by fire in 1911? Source: Andrews, Graeme (1994). The Ferries of Sydney. Sydney University Press. p. 161. ISBN 0424002027.
  • ALT1:... that Kaludah (built 1909) was designed by Walter Reeks as a fast steamer for Sydney Ferries Limited's Parramatta River service, but was destroyed by fire two years later? Source: Allen, Bill. "Mosman Historical Society presentation by Bill Allen on Sydney Harbour Ferries, 17 September 1984". Mosman Council. Mosman Historical Society. Retrieved 4 September 2021.

Created by Merbabu (talk). Self-nominated at 08:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Article is new and long enough and no plagiarism. The hooks are cited and ALT1 should be used as it is more interesting than the main one. QPQ not required by the user (this will be their fourth DYK nom FYI), and the picture is used in article, free use, and looks fine at 100px. One note Merbabu (that won't affect this nom), almost all the reference titles are WP:ALLCAPS aka "shouting". Please adjust those to normal title/sentence case. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Favre1fan93 for the review. A comment and a question: the "all caps" comes from the otherwise very handy citation generator at https://trove.nla.gov.au/ (eg, this article has cites under "i" at top left). I will contact them...maybe they can change it for future use. Also, how can find previous DYK's nominations? In my case, I nominated this article and Kulgoa recently, but don't recall the other two. thanks again, --Merbabu (talk) 22:28, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

@Merbabu: I can't speak to outside citation generators, but at least on Wikipedia, per WP:ALLCAPS, that should be avoided. In the DYK Toolbox template, there is a "QPQ check" link. Entering your username says you have DYK credit for Legion of Ratu Adil, Menara Kudus Mosque, and Kulgoa, and if you don't have any other active nominations, this will be your fourth. Once you hit 5, you need to start the QPQ process. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Favre1fan93 - of course, i wasn't pushing for CAPS, rather just saying where it came from. :-) As for the QPQ check, i don't think i had anything to do with a nomination...maybe i merely suggested them to the authors and the bot picked this up?. It was 10 years ago! :) whatever way, i will look out for DYK noms to review. thanks again. --Merbabu (talk) 02:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P3 without image