Talk:Kalamkaval
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Blockbuster
[edit]The film became a commercial success, and became a box office success with 75cr collection against 15cr budget. Its still running in theatres ~2025-31142-61 (talk) 02:55, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
Not done Need sources for the collection as per WP:ICTFSOURCES table. — Benison (Beni · talk)
Box office
[edit]I have removed the gross per WP:PINKVILLA. It is not reliable, and so is Sacnilk.com (see WP:ICTFSOURCES. Similarly, any website, be it reliable, if using Sacnilk.com as their source, is also not reliable per WP:FRUIT. We need a source that independently verifies the box office collection and doesn't use producers/actors as their source too (WP:PRIMARY). Ping me if any such source is found. Happy editing. — Benison (Beni · talk) 14:30, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
- Got one from moneycontrol.com by News18 group. So far, it is the only one I could find. It's a bit outdated, but still the best and reliable one I could find. Please ping if any thing that fulfills the criteria pops up. Thanks. — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Box office
[edit]The film collected above 70cr in the box office. So, rewrite please ~2025-31142-61 (talk) 19:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Please provide a source that is reliable as per WP:ICTFSOURCES and doesn't quote other unreliable sources or use primary sources. — Benison (Beni · talk) 20:19, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Done — Benison (Beni · talk) 20:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Box office success
[edit]Add that the film is a blockbuster at the box office, as it received positive review from critics, and by analysing the collection ~2025-31142-61 (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- Please provide a source that is reliable as per WP:ICTFSOURCES and doesn't quote other unreliable sources or use primary sources. — Benison (Beni · talk) 05:55, 19 December 2025 (UTC)