Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21fb28af939d04f

Jump to content

Talk:KMFDM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 months ago by HarbingerOfEntropy in topic should the page mention columbiners?
Good articleKMFDM has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 20, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
April 7, 2010Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 8, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
June 28, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
August 19, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 1, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Should MDFMK be a part of KMFDM? It's mixed right now

[edit]

What I mean is, should MDFMK be incorporated into KMFDM's history? Because as of right now, it's all mixed up.

If we DID incorporate it:

  • All member years would incorporate the MDFMK era. So for Sascha, it'd say 1984–present. This is how it looks now.
  • The infobox would have unbroken years. So, it'd say 1984–present. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The self-titled MDFMK album would be listed under Discography. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The timeline (on the separate members page) would have a black line for the MDFMK album, along with a colored bar for the MDFMK era. This is how it looks now.
  • The brief MDFMK tours would be listed under the List of tours section. This is NOT how it looks now.

If we did NOT incorporate it:

  • All member years would ignore the MDFMK era. So for Sascha, it'd say 1984–1999, 2002–present. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The infobox would have divided years. So, it'd say 1984–1999, 2002–present. This is how it looks now.
  • The self-titled MDFMK album would not be listed under Discography whatsoever. This is how it looks now.
  • The timeline (on the separate members page) would have no line for the MDFMK album nor any bars for the MDFMK era. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The brief MDFMK tours would not be listed under the List of tours section. This is how it looks now.

So, who is in favor of which? I feel like it needs to be one way or the other, no in between. Xanarki (talk) 00:36, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Personally, I think MDFMK should not be incorporated into KMFDM. It should be treated as a separate project, like Excessive Force, KGC, etc. And I feel like, for a long time, that's how it was viewed here. But I'm willing to see other POVs otherwise. Xanarki (talk) 00:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

should the page mention columbiners?

[edit]

i obviously dont want to talk about the god awful columbiners, but many people think that kmfdm supports columbiners/shooters. should there be a section discussing the widely believed connection between columbiners and kmfdm fans/members?? Oingoboingofan (talk) 21:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Their statement they made after the shooting feels like statement enough on their stance, however I see your point. Maybe like find more on what their reaction was? (Maybe this site could be helpful? It has quotes from the band) HarbingerOfEntropy (talk) 14:55, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply