Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22d97f64a428020

Jump to content

Talk:KITV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Crisco 1492 in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleKITV has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 21, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 27, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a Hawaii TV station telecast a football game as a favor to the state's dying former governor?

Article name

[edit]

This should be a disabigouity page, it's very US centric atm.

I have moved this article back to KITV from KITV-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here: the call letters for this station are in fact KITV. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. A 04:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

KIT is also the brand and domain name [|domain name] for Kingston Interactive Television which is certainly a lot more famous in Europe and in IPTV fields.

Then the article should be KIT or much more likely Kingston Interactive Television. I'd personaly think that having information about this brand on the page KITV would be out of place. A 18:37, 21 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 05:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KITV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KITV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KITV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:KITV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 17:23, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Olliefant (talk · contribs) 19:17, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the delay, I totally forgot about this, comments will be posted shortly Olliefant (she/her) 16:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply


Lead

[edit]
  • [multicultural] [independent station] [KIKU] MOS:SOB violation
    • I decided to cut the link on "multicultural" out in reorganization, mostly because what else was I going to do here?
  • "Hawaii" -> "Hawaiʻi" when talking about the island
    • Done

History

[edit]
KHVH-TV, channel 4
Merger
  • "near Philadelphia" cut this
  • Link the city and list the state on first mention
    • I won't fix the first because WKBS-TV's presence in Burlington was notably pretty skimpy. I have left WKBS-TV (Philadelphia) as an exception to the naming rules (and not WKBS-TV (New Jersey) for much the same reason.

News operation

[edit]
  • "local station able to do so" why?
    • It's unclear, but this was 2006, when this capability would have been less common than today. I can't expound with the available source.

Subchannels

[edit]

Satellite stations

[edit]
  • The table is missing the caption
    • I've added one.
  • Its close enough that I don't think the notes need to be seperate from the "Notes" subheading
    • Done

References

[edit]
  • Spot checks found nothing

@Olliefant: That should be it. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 813 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:45, 22 March 2026 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.
    Overall: New enough (promoted to GA 1 day before DYKN), well long enough (almost 4000 words), article is well-sourced, neutral, has green EW at 4.8%, and I don't see any other problems with the article. Hook is fully supported by the source, interesting, and 98 characters. QPQ was done and there is no image to review. Good to go! Zzz plant (talk) 01:05, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply