Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2261bb06fbf6bf7

Jump to content

Talk:KFC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 days ago by StefenTower in topic Suggestion
Good articleKFC has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 19, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
January 21, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 2, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 13, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
March 20, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 5, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 9, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 6, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 7, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
November 30, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Food safety scandal in Denmark, June 2025

[edit]

I just added this controversy to the end of the controversies section. So far, the only available sources are the TV station DR and the official inspection reports by the Government, both of which I cite as sources. Seems most other sources are just describing the DR reporting of the situation . In particular, I could not find an official statement from KFC Western Europe, only the quoting of such an alleged statement by DR. Jbohmdk (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

It would be interesting to know if all of the restaurants were owned by the same person, but I didn't see any mention in the source. I tweaked the wording, but it could probably use some trimming. I don't think it needs all of those details, just a tight summary. Schazjmd (talk) 23:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I agree Schazjmd that the content should probably be trimmed. I think there is an excessive amount of detail about this.
Guidelines at WP:CRIT also state that "In most cases, editors should avoid devoting a section to criticisms or controversies, as this violates neutral point of view. These sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints by giving them their own header; are not balanced, because they exclude positive information about the topic; create the appearance of a controversy, even if there isn't one; and often devolve into laundry lists of complaints, without regard for their notability or validity."
There are currently, at the time of this edit, 15 paragraphs in the "Controversies and criticism" section of the article, including the long paragraph about the 2025 Food safety scandal in Denmark. I think 15 paragraphs for this section is an excessive amount of detail and in my view there is WP:UNDUE weight given to some of the long list of complaints against KFC. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion

[edit]

move headquarter They are board staying in same place ~2026-39330-86 (talk) 06:23, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please help us figure out the change you are requesting by putting it in the format of "change x to y". Thanks. the Stefen 𝕋ower 06:56, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply