Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
The Urban Legends Reference (http://snopes.com) is generally a reliable source, often cited on Wikipedia. However, in a series of pages, known as The Repository of Lost Legends (TROLL), the Snopes site spoofs itself. Among those pages is this one about KFC. The acronym TROLL is a clue that the pages in that particular section, including the KFC page, are not to be taken seriously. Please read their explanation before altering this article. In particular, note that Kentucky Fried Chicken did not change its name because Kentucky decided to trademark its name.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This talk page is for an article related to KFC. If you wish to post a comment about a specific KFC related topic, please see one of the associated articles listed below.
Articles
For posts concerning the corporation, Please go to the KFC talk page.
For posts concerning its history, please go to the KFC history talk page.
For posts concerning its ad programs, please go to the KFC advertising talk page.
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I just added this controversy to the end of the controversies section. So far, the only available sources are the TV station DR and the official inspection reports by the Government, both of which I cite as sources. Seems most other sources are just describing the DR reporting of the situation . In particular, I could not find an official statement from KFC Western Europe, only the quoting of such an alleged statement by DR. Jbohmdk (talk) 23:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
It would be interesting to know if all of the restaurants were owned by the same person, but I didn't see any mention in the source. I tweaked the wording, but it could probably use some trimming. I don't think it needs all of those details, just a tight summary. Schazjmd(talk)23:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I agree Schazjmd that the content should probably be trimmed. I think there is an excessive amount of detail about this.
Guidelines at WP:CRIT also state that "In most cases, editors should avoid devoting a section to criticisms or controversies, as this violates neutral point of view. These sections call undue attention to negative viewpoints by giving them their own header; are not balanced, because they exclude positive information about the topic; create the appearance of a controversy, even if there isn't one; and often devolve into laundry lists of complaints, without regard for their notability or validity."
There are currently, at the time of this edit, 15 paragraphs in the "Controversies and criticism" section of the article, including the long paragraph about the 2025 Food safety scandal in Denmark. I think 15 paragraphs for this section is an excessive amount of detail and in my view there is WP:UNDUE weight given to some of the long list of complaints against KFC. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply