Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23c2f931b2a0d7f

Jump to content

Talk:Jysk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Martinevans123 in topic Jysk or JYSK

Article title

[edit]

WP:TRADEMARK says: "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, even if the trademark owner considers nonstandard formatting "official", as long as this is a style already in widespread use, rather than inventing a new one: avoid: TIME, KISS, ASUS; instead, use: Time, Kiss, Asus."

According to this policy, the articled should be titled "Jysk", and the company should be referred to in the article as "Jysk". Per Wikipedia custom, the company's preferred capitalisation would be identified in the lead paragraph. Any objections? Ground Zero | t 16:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Asda, Lidl, Aldi and even Tesco all suggest that you are quite right. Note that "Jysk" currently leads to a disambiguation page, but the other meaning has a very different article title. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:02, 14 August 2014 (UTC) p.s. but we still have IKEA?Reply
"... the company's name is an acronym that consists of the initials of Ingvar Kamprad, Elmtaryd (the farm where he grew up), and Agunnaryd...." so IKEA is correct. Asda and Aldi are contractions, rather than acronyms. Lidl was someone's family name. The former T.E. Stockwell Co. has a stronger argument for being all-capitalised, but the company doesn't use that style itself, so I don't think Wikipedia should either. Ground Zero | t 01:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ah, so they don't suggest you're right at all. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but I think my argument is still valid on the basis of WP:TRADEMARK. Ground Zero | t 13:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
You think that TESCO "doesn't use an all-capitalised style itself"? Um, when was the last time you looked at one of their store fronts, haha? Similarly, with all the UK JYSK shop fronts. Indeed even the JYSK website consistently uses the capitalised version. But wiki policy is policy, I guess.Martinevans123 (talk) 13:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I should have been clearer. I meant to say that Tesco doesn't use all-caps consistently. They do in their logo, but if you look at their website, you see that they use "Tesco" more than "TESCO". Ground Zero | t 16:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I wonder how many of these there are - and if they have any more (or any less) cultural significance than website pages? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
And let's not forget good old SPAR - originally a Dutch acronym, apparently? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just a commen to "wiki policy is wiki policy", we have the policy Wikipedia:Ignore all rules, and Wikipedia:Trademarks says "Use common sense in applying it; it will have occasional exceptions" Christian75 (talk) 17:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Personally I'd call it JYSK, since Jysk to me looks too much like a real Danish word (the word for Jutland, in fact). Martinevans123 (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
lots of companies have names that are the same as words in English or other languages ('ford', 'spark' and 'trump' are English words and corporate names, and the policy mentions 'time' and 'kiss'), but we don't have an exception from WP:TRADEMARK to cover this situation. I haven't seen a reason to ignore this policy beyond that the company prefers all-caps, which is not a good reason at all since that is exactly the situation that the policy is intended to cover. Ground Zero | t 18:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
As I said, it's just a personal opinion. I wasn't expecting it to trump policy or spark a dispute. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think you should review this instructional video. ;-) Ground Zero | t 20:55, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Haha, don't worry. Not my "first time" and that one's on my playlist! I find Scandinavian culture so confusing. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC) Reply

Jysk or JYSK

[edit]

Ten years later....should it be Jysk or JYSK? The Danish article at JUSK has "JYSK" throughout? Martinevans123 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jysk opened 23 stores in Russia

[edit]
  1. Mega Stan-Sea, February 1, 2025 (Moscow)
  2. Torgovyj razvlekatel'nyj centr "Sharon", September 3, 2023 (Moscow)
  3. Aviapark, March 1, 2023 (Moscow)
  4. Torgovyj razvlekatel'nyj centr "Zona", December 14, 2022 (Saint-Petersburg)
  5. Torgovyj razvlekatel'nyj centr "Zona", October 30, 2022 (Moscow)
  6. Torgovyj razvlekatel'nyj centr "Koran", October 1, 2022 (Moscow)
  7. Torgovyj centr "Vanadium", August 21, 2022 (Moscow)
  8. Torgovyj centr "Sons", August 2, 2022 (Moscow)
  9. Torgovyj centr "Premier", July 31, 2022 (Saint-Petersburg)
  10. Torgovyj centr "Mego", July 1, 2022 (Moscow)
  11. Maxima Hyper, June 12, 2022 (Tolyatti)
  12. Maxima Hyper, June 3, 2022 (Voronezh)
  13. Auchan, June 1, 2022 (Voronezh)
  14. Sky Shopping Park, May 29, 2022 (Biysk)
  15. Maxima X, May 22, 2022 (Moscow)
  16. Maxima X, May 21, 2022 (Tyumen)
  17. Maxima XX, May 10, 2022 (Donetsk)
  18. Maxima XXX, May 8, 2022 (Saint-Petersburg)
  19. Maxima XXX, May 5, 2022 (Moscow)
  20. Carrefour, May 4, 2022 (Moscow)
  21. Machdina, May 2, 2022 (Moscow)
  22. Maxima XXX, May 2, 2022 (Moscow)
  23. Torgovyj centr "Premier", May 1, 2022 (Moscow)