Talk:Justinian Nutt
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MSincccc in topic GA review
| Justinian Nutt has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 27, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Justinian Nutt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 19:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 09:23, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Images
- I would suggest adding alt text to the captions of all the images. MSincccc (talk) 09:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- @MSincccc: Hi, thanks for taking this on. I've added alt text to the images. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Prose
- He joined the Royal Navy on 4 December 1728, becoming a captain's servant... Were there multiple captains aboard the ship? If not, shouldn't the definite article be used here?
- I've added the wiktionary link for this. Captain's servant was a rating, so the wording here is akin to saying "becoming an admiral..."
- "100 men dead from scurvy" → "100 men to scurvy" (More natural phrasing; "dead from scurvy" is awkward).
- I've rejigged this differently as I think it's important to keep in that they died and were not only incapacitated or suffering from scurvy, let me know if you think this works
- Nutt subsequently provided navigational notes to the chaplain, Walter,... "Walter" had already been described as the chaplain in the same section.
- Removed excess
MSincccc (talk) 15:18, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
Source-to-text spot check
- 2-
Done - 5-
Done - 7-
Done - 17-
Done - 30-
Done
MSincccc (talk) 09:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles





