Talk:Jupiter Ace
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jupiter Ace article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trim and tidy
[edit]I've done a pretty extensive "trim and tidy" over the last couple of days, but I'm no expert of the Jupiter Ace and it's possible that while I've probably improved the English, I may have mangled some of the facts. Please check, and fix as required! - (If you can understand the "ACE's Forth" section then please have a go at tidying up the writing there too).Snori (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
kB/KB
[edit]This entire article was using "kB" to indicate memory sizes, which is factually wrong, since kB is defined as 1000 bytes. Computers of this era used 1024-byte kilobytes, so all storage references have been corrected to "KB".Sirfurboy (talk) 10:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Sales
[edit]I have to think the template of "original research" is more vandalism by the people citations, of which the latest is 2016, literally over 6 years ago. Original research is appropriate for sections with NO citations!
"What is an Ace". Archived from the original on 2012-06-17. Retrieved 2008-09-24. "Jupiter Ace Resource Site - Your Computer Review, November 1982". Retrieved 2013-04-27. "Jupiter Ace Software Index". Archived from the original on 2007-05-23. Retrieved 2014-10-05. "Jupiter Ace Resource Site - Letter - Ace Goes Back To School in Popular Computing Weekly 11 November 1982". Retrieved 2013-04-27. "The Jupiter Ace is 30 - Page 5 • The Register". Retrieved 2013-04-27.
Removed Lead too short tag
[edit]That tag has been on this article for over five years, despite the fact the lead seems perfectly proportionate to the rest of the article. It might be a sentence or two longer, sure, but it's nowhere near deserving a maintenance template! If you disagree with this change, let's try and build consensus here. MrAureliusRYell at me! 16:27, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles
- Mid-importance Computer hardware articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles of Mid-importance
- All Computing articles
- C-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
