Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23b5abb9887ae97

Jump to content

Talk:Junkie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2001:8003:20E0:4E00:C1BD:7CBE:B9E3:8F18 in topic Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2015

Interwiki

[edit]

Hello, I noticed that the interwiki links are not all about the same topic. There are two topics: Junk_(song) and Junkie (someone who is addicted to drugs). Therefore I decided to remove the interwikilinks to articles which are not about the same topic. When you edit the links on an article, please edit them here, too. --Church of emacs 14:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Articles about the song

[edit]

Articles about drug addict

[edit]

Drug addict

[edit]

I would contest the assertion that junkie refers to any drug addict. Sure, the term has come to be prefaced with qualifiers for other, facetious “addictions” (e.g. “political junkie”) but one would never hear the term, for example, “weed junkie,” or “crank junkie,” unless it was, once again, a facetious use. Indeed, I would argue, constructions such as those arise from the more general use of junkie having come to mean “enthusiast.” For other drug addictions, there are, also, specific terms: speed freak, pothead, wino, etc. Using junkie, unqualified, I believe refers only to heroin addicts, and I have edited the page accordingly. —Wikipedihol Junkie 00:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do agree with your removal of the statement about 'junkie' primarily referring to a(ny) drug addict. However, 'junkie' is a commonly used term for a person who has a substance addiction, and as such, have added a link to the Drug Addiction page in the list. Jersey emt (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Origin of the term

[edit]

This article, apparently reproduced from a September 1998 edition of the Sunday Times, may be of interest: "In 1913, Bayer decided to stop making heroin. There had been an explosion of heroinrelated admissions at New York and Philadelphia hospitals, and in East Coast cities a substantial population of recreational users was reported (some supported their habits by collecting and selling scrap metal, hence the name "junkie")." DWaterson (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2015

[edit]

The term "junkie" originated from the 1920's when heroin addicts would sell scrap metal and other junk to pay for their habit.

Sources - History Today: http://www.historytoday.com/ian-scott/heroin-hundred-year-habit Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/278gaq/til_that_the_word_junkie_originates_from_the/ Bluelight: http://www.bluelight.org/vb/archive/index.php/t-69589.html


Rhinoslot (talk) 09:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

 Not done The History Today source is okay, but the other two are not reliable. There is also a source mentioned in the previous talk page section above. It's possible, but I doubt this is accurate, and it's too neat not to consider the possibility of false etymology. The Online Etymology Dictionary says that junk has been used to refer to narcotics prior to the use of junkie, which could be wrong, but Wikipedia shouldn't be propagating these kinds of things without very solid sources. Grayfell (talk) 22:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
There was a Rd in Shanghai called Junkie in 1920. My grandfather lived and died in that road in 1921. He was a merchant selling aspirin. This could mean that Junk was a term referring to drugs, not just heroine. Paul Coz 2001:8003:20E0:4E00:C1BD:7CBE:B9E3:8F18 (talk) 03:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)Reply