Talk:Julian Teicke
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 years ago by JamesG5 in topic Questionable sources
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Questionable sources
[edit]I tagged this for multiple questionable sources, the comment made on the tag being removed specifically cited one of those questionable sources as "3rd party." Please consider the issues with these sources:
- https://www.venturelab.swiss/wefox-CEO-shares-his-journey-with-aspiring-founders publicity cite to promote its members,pieces are basically press releases and "read more" tabs/links go directly to company pages. Multiple "articles" on the company in question.
- https://insurtechdigital.com/insurtech/rising-star-julian-teicke literally a press release from another promotional organization
- https://www.altassets.net/fintechforum/speaker/julian-teicke/ self created forum bio
- https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180806005267/en/wefox-Continues-to-Expand-and-Launches-in-Italy BusinessWire is a self described press release organ
- https://moneyinc.com/wefox/ I'd like to see this site reviewed as a source, glancing thru it, it looks very sketchy. Seems to be a lot of promotional pieces.
Several other entries follow the same patter of being on promotional sites, company pages for companies the subject owns, self-written bios, etc. IMO they need a comprehensice review. JamesG5 (talk) 04:53, 24 May 2023 (UTC)