Talk:Journalism
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Journalism article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| Professional journalism was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 06 October 2009 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was selected as the article for improvement on 22 December 2012 for a period of one week. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2021 and 14 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Laurengordon4. Peer reviewers: Jhulty, Mongellip.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Adding the section, "Copyright and Fair Use"
[edit]I have added this section to the Wikipedia Journalism entry because copyright and fair use are important guidelines to follow when pursuing journalism. People who want to pursue a career in journalism should be made aware of copyright laws and what fair use means. It is important to note about fair use that many journalists are protected under fair use but they still need to understand what copyright laws mean, how they work, and what they, as a journalist, can do to follow those laws. Though many journalists are protected under fair use and the First Amendment, there are things that are not covered by fair use and it is often up to the court system about whether or not a journalists work can/will be considered fair use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eahazellief (talk • contribs) 17:37 20 September 2020 (UTC)
==Wiki Education assignment: CMN2160C==
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2022 and 16 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Huipeng Kang (article contribs).
Journalism is not just about news
[edit]the text is saying that journalists only create content about news.this is not true. Arman gh82 (talk) 16:53, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits are unsourced and grammatically incorrect. They are not an improvement to the article. MrOllie (talk) 16:57, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Is there any way we can include the impact of spreading fake news on a global scale? For example, the mounds of fake news that marked the Covid 19 period?
Amraamir9 (talk) 03:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- How
- To do it 143.44.184.225 (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Edit Request
[edit]| This edit request by an editor with a partial block from editing this page has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed:
In Social media section:
| − | + | In 2025, 28% of Americans expressed a great deal or fair amount of trust in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately and fairly. |
- Why it should be changed:
Updates an outdated media-trust statistic.
- References supporting the possible change:
Trust in Media at New Low of 28% in U.S.
Goldenpen1 (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
References
Goldenpen1 (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Not done, the 2014 study, Hefflin 2015, is a peer-reviewed study, whereas the new source you provide here is a public survey. Gallup is a reputable publisher of surveys, but survey results don't supersede peer-reviewed scholarship, especially when they report a "new low" (28% expressing high confidence) that is higher than the level of trust reported in Hefflin (22% expressing high confidence). There's probably a good way to incorporate the Gallup survey into the article, but replacing the Hefflin 2015 isn't it. signed, Rosguill talk 17:32, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-3 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Top-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class Media articles
- High-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- C-Class Writing articles
- Low-importance Writing articles
- WikiProject Writing articles
- Wikipedia former articles for improvement
- Implemented requested edits
