Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Joth Hunt is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi the article creator has added on my talk page why I’ve tagged this article for notability. My review of the sources in the article is:
1. Verifies content but does not demonstrate notability
2. Not independent
3. Self authored, not a third party review
4. Written independently but basically an interview
5. Record release pr that quotes from the next source
6. Written independently but basically an interview
7. Good source, independently written and not primarily a rehash of what the subject says about himself.
8. Self published source
9. More or less verbatim the same as source 6, showing it is basically a press release
10. Another version of the same press release
11. Supports verifiability, not notability
12. Confirms that he was nominated for an award but did not win it.
My conclusion is that while the band may be notable it’s less clear that the article subject is notable on his own. The article is mainly based on interviews and press releases. If he had not received coverage for his cancer, I doubt there would be much basis for an article at all. If he is genuinely and independently notable there must be better sources than this. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 09:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)Reply