Talk:Jonson
Add topic| This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| On 30 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Jonson (name) to Jonson. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 30 November 2023
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonson (disambiguation) has concluded as delete. Taking comments in both discussions into account, there's a clear consensus to move the name page to the base name. (closed by non-admin page mover) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Jonson (name) → Jonson – WP:PTOPIC and need histmerge. Jax 0677 (talk) 21:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- The unspoken part here is there's a question whether Ben Jonson is still the primary topic here as was discussed in 2004, or should it be the surname. I'm not sure from mass views for Jonson - he does still stand out quite a bit. The Google Books Ngrams also correlate quite a bit. WikiNav for Jonson doesn't get enough traffic to render. I suppose we should also compare with what happens at Johnson? --Joy (talk) 16:26, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- There's also weirdness in the fact that there's a few given name uses at Jonson (disambiguation) separately. This is a weird case of WP:NAMELIST - using "(name)" as the disambiguation marker for the surnames, but not given names. Mass views for that in turn shows a young footballer attracting a bit of attention recently, but it's still way lower than Ben Jonson - though that might be because of this weird contraption of a navigation we have going on here. --Joy (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- One possibility is that Ben Jonson is not important enough to be a primary topic (PT) for just "Jonson" but is important enough to stop anything else being a PT, i.e. that "Jonson" has no PT. In that case, Jonson (disambiguation) should be moved to the base name Jonson. Certes (talk) 17:18, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- It's hard to see a case for keeping separate pages Jonson (disambiguation) and Jonson (name), as both provide a disambiguation function and both are mainly a list of names. We should probably merge them into either one dab (my preference) or a name list. Whether to do this is orthogonal to whether Ben is the primary topic. Certes (talk) 17:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, a big squash of both lists into one list seems most prudent at this point, and then listing Ben at the top per MOS:DABCOMMON. There is no etymological information about the surname here, it seems like a hodgepodge, so it might as well get reduced back to a disambiguation list. --Joy (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Reply - If Jonson Gallery is listed in the article, it should be a disambiguation page. In any event, Jonson should NOT be a redirect. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, is it reasonable to expect for anyone to refer to that gallery as simply "Jonson"? Agreed about the redirect, that's a bad remnant of moves. --Joy (talk) 08:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with that gallery, but others such as the Tate are commonly referred to without the suffix. Certes (talk) 12:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Well, is it reasonable to expect for anyone to refer to that gallery as simply "Jonson"? Agreed about the redirect, that's a bad remnant of moves. --Joy (talk) 08:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Reply - If Jonson Gallery is listed in the article, it should be a disambiguation page. In any event, Jonson should NOT be a redirect. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:52, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yeah, a big squash of both lists into one list seems most prudent at this point, and then listing Ben at the top per MOS:DABCOMMON. There is no etymological information about the surname here, it seems like a hodgepodge, so it might as well get reduced back to a disambiguation list. --Joy (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- There's also weirdness in the fact that there's a few given name uses at Jonson (disambiguation) separately. This is a weird case of WP:NAMELIST - using "(name)" as the disambiguation marker for the surnames, but not given names. Mass views for that in turn shows a young footballer attracting a bit of attention recently, but it's still way lower than Ben Jonson - though that might be because of this weird contraption of a navigation we have going on here. --Joy (talk) 16:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Relisting comment: The consensus should be more clearer. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:51, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Move to Jonson as a name page, not a disambiguation page. There is just not enough to disambiguate. The Gallery is named for a surnamed Jonson, and is probably rarely called "Jonson" by itself, so it can be noted in a see also section. BD2412 T 00:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Proposals
[edit]I propose voting for the best option.
Merge Jonson (name) and Jonson (disambiguation) into Jonson
[edit]
Support merging all pages into one article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Leaving aside the merging issue in the RM, this option is the same as moving Jonson (disambiguation) into Jonson for no primary topic. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Move Jonson (name) into Jonson
[edit]Move Jonson (disambiguation) into Jonson
[edit]Merge Jonson (disambiguation) into Jonson (name)
[edit]Merge Jonson (name) into Jonson (disambiguation)
[edit]Retarget Jonson to Ben Jonson
[edit]--Jax 0677 (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I haven't seen enough discussion about if Ben Jonson should be the primary topic here before I relisted this RM. If Ben Jonson remains primary while Jonson shouldn't be a redirect, it will be moved there instead. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: Sorry, but please may refer to WP:NOTVOTE. I'm not asking for such a voting to build a rough consensus. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)