Talk:Jonathan Reynolds

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jonathan Reynolds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160207215111/http://tamesidelabour.co.uk/jonathan-reynolds/ to http://tamesidelabour.co.uk/jonathan-reynolds/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101219202900/http://labourlist.org/ppc-profile-jonathan-reynolds to http://www.labourlist.org/ppc-profile-jonathan-reynolds
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160829003426/http://electoral-reform.org.uk/blog/jonathan-reynolds-speech to http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/blog/jonathan-reynolds-speech

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

"Language of the far right"

It looks as if there is a revert war about about a paragraph that has recently been added to the lede (it's been added, then removed, then added again). This statement cited a reliable source but, as the editor who removed it says, it does not use appropriately neutral language; by being placed in the lede it has also been given undue prominence (there is nothing about this incident in the main body of the article). I am reverting this, and if the consensus among editors is that it needs to be put back in, I think it needs to be put under "Secretary of State for Business and Trade (2024–present)". Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

@Per$1$tenceofv1$1on, this content? There is nothing in the cited Guardian source supporting "started using the language of the far right", is there? -- DeFacto (talk). 17:45, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @DeFacto. I didn't actually read the Guardian article - maybe I assumed too much good faith! I make that three valid reasons why the edit should stay reverted. Per$1$tenceofv1$1on (talk) 13:25, 19 August 2025 (UTC)