Talk:Jonathan Pageau
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by MatthewDalhousie in topic Sources
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 June 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Improvements
[edit]Hi @Remsense,
Thanks for the attention you gave this article. After I saw the tag, I spent some time giving it a purge. Mostly removing profile-journalism-like language, and sourcing better citations, usually from specialist online journals. A few parts of the article just had to go because there really was not reliable source at all. If you can point out anything in particular I might have missed, please let me know.
MatthewDalhousie (talk) 02:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your feedback here @Remsense. Having improved the citations, and removed the peacock language, I think the article is in a place where we can remove the flag? MatthewDalhousie (talk) 00:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- As per above discussion, as needed changes have been made, will remove tags. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 00:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Hi @Jamiebuba noticed you made this change - can you tell me what you mean "source verification failed"? Cheers. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 07:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Have tried to start a discussion, and achieve a consensus with you and other interested editors here @Jamiebuba. Puzzled that you've not taken that invitation. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 01:09, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Source materials have been revised as per this advice. Grateful for the suggestions and the prompt that improved the article overall. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 04:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)