Talk:Jonathan Legard
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by 77.99.63.238 in topic Untitled
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I added more accurate information about legards style and public perception. He is clearly not liked by many fans and his article read like a proper gander article before hand, with no references etc... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.159.132 (talk) 22:43, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The controversy surrounding Jonathan Legard appears to be reaching a peak. Given that rumour persists of his impending removal from his post I feel it is important that, insofar as wikipedia can go within the guidelines, the article shows that there is widespread disappointment in his performance. Please follow the references to see the source material.77.99.63.238 (talk) 18:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)