Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a263140b699d21ca

Jump to content

Talk:John Money

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by ~2026-28912-43 in topic Grammatical error

So where's the section for his contraveries?

[edit]

I distinctly remember a whole section that was dedicated to talking about his "contraversial" works and statements but its gone now. You guys wanna bring it back? 2601:204:E700:3CE0:2C77:6148:6F7D:2790 (talk) 12:49, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The page already covers his controversies. Wikipedia discourages the creation of specific "controversies" sections. Zenomonoz (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
There are many paid activists whose whole job is to monitor these pages, not only maintaining them in the preferred state but nudging them towards the "correct" history. A lot of history has been rewritten in this area over the past 10 or so years. Dlobr (talk) 22:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
Dlobr, no. The article includes heavy coverage of his career, including controversial elements. Wikipedia biographies should avoid separate "controversy" sections for a reason, WP:NOCRIT. We work this through the article instead. Zenomonoz (talk) 02:46, 13 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
FWIW, I agree with discouraging specific controversies sections. On the other hand, it's not an outright ban, and when someone is known primarily because of his controversial work it might just be appropriate to summarise why that is so I'm a specific section, for the TLDR crowd. ~2026-12371-00 (talk) 10:41, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2024

[edit]

There is a link to regarding a book that John Money wrote with Richard Greene. The link goes to actor Richard Greene's page, but instead should link to Richard Green the sexologist's page here.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Green_(sexologist) 2601:402:4402:3FB0:35C2:98B5:7E8C:5A2F (talk) 01:14, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: I could only find one mention of a Richard Green[e] in this article (in the fourth paragraph of the "Career and views" section), and it is already appropriately linked to Richard Green (sexologist). Left guide (talk) 04:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Grammatical error

[edit]

Transgender people and the Johns Hopkins gender clinic Money had a particular interest in gender dysphoria and transgender people. He believed transgender people had an Idée fixe; a preoccupation of the mind resistant to change. According to Goldie, Money is a seen as a "negative figure" among transgender people. In one paper, Money described trans women as "devious, demanding and manipulative in their relationships with people on whom they are also dependent" and “possibly also incapable of love.”

The underlined 'a' in the second paragraph does not belong there. 50.123.66.70 (talk) 05:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done will fix. Zenomonoz (talk) 05:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
So just fix it. You can just fix typos without having to report them. ~2026-28912-43 (talk) 21:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply