Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2629cbfbcd2dbb4

Jump to content

Talk:John Liston

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Bob Burkhardt in topic Assessment comment

Untitled

[edit]

John Liston was also the name of the captain of the brigantine Margaret & Anne which sailed to Iceland in 1809 with Samuel Phelps (the soapmaker), William Jackson Hooker and Jørgen Jørgensen. There they staged a coup d'etat which was resolved in August when Jørgen was arrested by the british and taken to Van Diemens Land. The ship, Margaret & Anne caught fire on it's way back to England - I don't know what happened to the captain, but William Hooker survived to tell the tale. --Smári McCarthy 13:38, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, it was a frigate, not a brigantine, according to my sources (Sjálfstæði Íslands 1809 by Helgi P. Briem); but I think that may be somewhat incorrect, since most English frigates would have, at this time, been used in the Napoleonic wars. It may have been a frigate-like ship. It would have hardly classified as a sixth-rate frigate at any rate, bearing only 10 cannons - six large (12 pounders) and four wheel mounted (6 pounders). Perhaps rather in the liking of an East Indiaman? Anyway, the sail plan sounds like a frigate, so it may well have been. --Smári McCarthy 13:59, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:John Liston/CommentsTalk:John Liston/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It just has the very brief contents of the 1911 Britannica article with no supporting material. Some links and categories. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 20:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)