Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
A fact from John Atcheler appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 February2021(check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Fine on creation - nomination time, and on length, sourcing OK (was potentially impacted by a one-line "paragraph" but that should have been within the preceding paragraph anyway), no cross-article copying found, Earwig found 0% except one catch-phrase, which is valid. Hook is certainly catchy, and its one core fact is cited adequately for its type. Pictures in article are OK, not used in nomination anyway. QPQ fine, technical issue noted and resolved. SeoR (talk) 10:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Fine on creation - nomination time, and on length, sourcing OK (was potentially impacted by a one-line "paragraph" but that should have been within the preceding paragraph anyway), no cross-article copying found, Earwig found 0% except one catch-phrase, which is valid. Hook is certainly catchy, and its one core fact is cited adequately for its type. Pictures in article are OK, not used in nomination anyway. QPQ fine, technical issue noted and resolved. SeoR (talk) 10:41, 3 February 2021 (UTC)