Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22cb1061eb9f54b

Jump to content

Talk:Jimmy Sham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Citobun in topic Why the removal of wikilink for "drag"?
[edit]

User Citobun, explain yourself why you removed the wikilink for "drag"? What are you trying to hide? STSC (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mistake. I meant to revert a different edit (the one that changed "human rights" to "LGBT rights" – on the grounds that he does not exclusively campaign for LGBT rights). Citobun (talk) 08:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Feminist you don't own the article

[edit]

User feminist although you created the article but you don't own it. I tried to improve this new article but you have reverted almost all my edits. Please discuss the issues first. STSC (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

For the record I did not "revert almost all [of your] edits"; some of them, such as the addition of portal links, build on your contributions. Anyway, I have explained my reverts clearly in my edit summaries. Happy to discuss specific issues you may have with the article under the WP:BRD process. feminist (talk) 10:30, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
"BRD is not an excuse to revert any change more than once"and you just randomly picked an excuse to revert. Particularly why you removed the external links section which is very normal for an article to have this section. STSC (talk) 11:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Did I revert any change more than once? No, I did not. If the only external link added to an article is inappropriate, of course the section should be removed. feminist (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
At least 4 times you have reverted. Why the link to Rainbow of Hong Kong is inappropriate? It's mentioned in the lead. STSC (talk) 12:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
It's not his official site, for one, so the link to Rainbow of Hong Kong does not meet WP:ELYES. WP:ELNO point 13 states sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject should not be linked; Jimmy Sham is not the leader or even a major figure in Rainbow of Hong Kong. The fact that the organisation is mentioned in the lead section does not mean it should be added as an external link, per WP:ELNO point 19. Basically as I stated in the edit summary. feminist (talk) 13:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
I put the external link because it has a red link (no wikilink). I accept your explanation. STSC (talk) 00:11, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply