Talk:Jhapa 1
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 months ago by 1isall in topic Requested move 9 March 2026
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| On 9 March 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Jhapa 1 (constituency) to Jhapa 1. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 9 March 2026
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. Anyone is free to nominate the rest of the constituencies for move. (closed by non-admin page mover) 1isall (talk | contribs) 12:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
- Jhapa 1 (constituency) → Jhapa 1
- Jhapa 2 (constituency) → Jhapa 2
- Jhapa 3 (constituency) → Jhapa 3
- Jhapa 4 (constituency) → Jhapa 4
- Jhapa 5 (constituency) → Jhapa 5
– No need to add disambiguation when they're the only articles with that name. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:58, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 09:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Support similar to WP:NCUKPARL. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Comment The discussion should include all 165 constituencies. PenGear (talk) 21:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.