Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26dd2f7cbde4afc

Jump to content

Talk:Jewish quota

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See as well

[edit]

Racial quota

Karmela (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lack of clarity

[edit]

What does "1.5 quota" mean? The paragraph is unclear. Zerotalk 01:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

RfC

[edit]

Light bulb iconAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. MrX 16:51, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Where would we put Asian Quota that was in place at UCs?

[edit]

Obviously not here, but it is of great importance to note that as late as the 1990s and maybe later, there was discrimination in place against Asians in the name of "diversity" -- how any different at all than Jewish Quota?--Jrm2007 (talk) 09:47, 10 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add it to numerus clausus then. Zezen (talk) 16:03, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Canada

[edit]

I do not think the source supports the statement about Canadian universities. While McGill and UofT had Jewish quotas, Queen's never did. See Queen's University, 1691-2004 - Testing Tradition, p. 354. TFD (talk) 16:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article fails to make it clear that these were in fact Jewish quotas

[edit]

I'm especially curious as to the quotas in Canada. I notice that there's no direct pasted-copy of the text of the polices in question. It needs to be fleshed out whether or not these quotas targeted Jews or were directed against all persons who were not white, Christian, and of European descent, and maybe not male. Is this article asserting that Asians, blacks, women, non-Christians, and/or other categories were not impacted by requiring a certain percentage of admissions go to persons of an allegedly "ideal" type? If there really was a policy against Jews and against only Jews and not anyone else, document it. But a policy directed against, for instance, all-non-Christians, while it effects Jews, is not a policy targeting Jews per se and should not be reported as such.~2026-20619-07 (talk) 19:48, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence SimpsonReply