Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a258df30a986bdc9

Jump to content

Talk:Jewish lobby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 days ago by Bobfrombrockley in topic US only?

Fringe?

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Jewish_lobby that was mentioned in the recently removed tags. Restoring since it looks like the concerns have not been sdressed. Sjö (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion there does not explain why it is "Fringe theory" (the noticeboarsd statute says "Fringe theories noticeboard - dealing with all sorts of pseudoscience") hence posted on wrong noticeboard. I am removing the tag. If there are real objections, the article content must be discussed in article talk page in the first place. - Altenmann >talk 04:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

OR

[edit]

@Lumbering in thought: The WP:ONUS is on you to change WP:CONSENSUS. Provide RS that identify Democratic Majority for Israel as the Jewish lobby, that the Jewish lobby pursues policies "favorable to diaspora Jews—as opposed to Jews broadly", and states that the Jewish lobby take positions "by dint of residing predominantly in the Jewish diaspora." This is OR (and wrong). Adding relevant tags while this is worked out. You are seeking to add material that is wrong and doesn't have consensus. Longhornsg (talk) 05:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

The intro

[edit]

US only?

[edit]

Is this article about the US "Jewish lobby" specifically? If so, the lead should say so, but possibly the title should change. The content is very US-specific, except for some paras in the "Contemporary usage" section, so it either needs a globalise tag or clarification/name change. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply