Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22441799dddcf42

Jump to content

Talk:Jettying

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Eishiya in topic Internal jetties

Article title

[edit]

I've improved the title to fit with Wikipedia naming conventions, but it is not perfect. The advantage of Jettying is that verb is unique to the building use of Jetty. It is also relatively common to refer to a jettied building. However, another alternative would be Jetty (building) - 'Jetty (architecture)' could still apply to maritime Jetties. -- Solipsist 18:21, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Diagram would be nice

[edit]

{{reqdiagram}} The current article has two sections summarizing the horizontal and vertical elements of a jettied storey, but they're not very clear without a diagram to show where each element goes. --Quuxplusone 22:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here are two that need a bit of English annotating:
(If you're not up to image editing I recommend going to a WP:Graphics Lab and asking for help) --pfctdayelise (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jetty vs Cantilever

[edit]

The term used in the section on Jettying seem to be old English briticisms. I have never before seen the terms in use in architecture or engineering while I've been studying or practicing architecture in the United States. Gary Wheeler, AIA WonderWheeler (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, yes, it is bound to be British usage. They go back to the 12th to the 16th centuries. Jetty, jettie, or jutty, and therefore the practice of building them being "jettying", is the term shown in the Oxford Dictionary of Architecture by James Stevens Curl, OUP, 1999. I don't know whether you can lay your hands on it through American libraries, but that is where you can look it up. Quite true, the definition of jetty is indeed "formed by cantilevered floor-joints", but the keyword is "jetty", etc. Yes, if you were to build a house in that style during the present time you would probably call it "cantilevered".
By the same token would you have heard of "bressummer" or "breastsummer" for the wall that either projects from the wall below, or the wall below that supports the wall above in these ancient houses? You will have seen a few of these in Stratford-upon-Avon, Shakespeare's town. Dieter Simon (talk) 23:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

jettying in plain style of lisbon

[edit]

em ressalto, in portuguese, can be about the main facade but also about each story, that thus uses public space away from circulation, while giving room for a landing to longer stairs and private area too, on the inside close to facade, in plain architecture that is, since medieval revivals can add it to some rooms for style recognition — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deslize (talkcontribs) 13:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

"They are considered a Gothic style..."

[edit]

Are they? I wouldn't have thought so. Given, they date back to the same general era as Gothic churches; but there, surely, any resemblance ends. Nuttyskin (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Taxes? Is this true?

[edit]

I heard somewhere that the main reason they did this at some point, in some nation, was because houses were taxed based on the square footage of the ground floor, thus making it possible to save BIG BUX!!! by having a smaller footprint. I see no mention of this in the article and can't find anything about it online. Is this just total dreck? jp×g🗯️ 07:38, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Internal jetties

[edit]

The lede mentions internal jetties with a source, but the statement is marked dubious. I have a corroborating source - John Schofield's Medieval London Houses, pp. 168-9 has a description and reconstruction diagram of a different house, known from a 1405 contract by the Dean and Chapter of St Paul's to be built on Bucklersbury in London, which has a second floor chamber sat on a wall between the hall and kitchen, jettying five feet into both (using the term "jetty" in the diagram). This is similar to what's described in the current source. Would adding Medieval London Houses as an additional source be enough to warrant removing the doubt, or should the nature of these internal jetties be explained further? In the latter case, this information should probably be moved out of the lede and into its own section. Eishiya (talk) 15:51, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply