Talk:Jetpack Cat
Add topic| Jetpack Cat has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 26, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jetpack Cat/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 22:46, 3 April 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 22:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Looks interesting; I will review this within a week or two! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 22:52, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Copyvio check
All good on this front.
- Prose
- Remove "to see how far they could go" as redundant IMO.
- "and himself was unsure" – change to "and he himself was unsure".
- I would do "Kaplan and artist Arnold Tsang".
- "which showed two unique takes designs" – change to "which showed two unique designs:" also including the colon.
- "blue harnessed unique with thrusters" – I think should be "a blue harness with thrusters".
- "resource, it recovers" – change to "resource, which is recovered".
- No need for the quotation marks on "cooldown" in this section.
- I think the third and final paragraph in § Gameplay makes more sense to be moved up to § Concept and creation, maybe under § Design.
- "thanks to him speaking English" – should be "due to him speaking English" as it is more formal.
- "Wrecking Ball felt like a character added to be funny and cute, contrasting Jetpack Cat with him" – this is a confusing sentence; I think you mean "Wrecking Ball felt like a character added to be funny and cute, in contrast to Jetpack Cat" if that is what the source meant.
- Spotcheck
Passes on the refs I checked: 1, 10, 14 and 15.
- Alright—there we go! You know the drill by now. Over to you! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 00:35, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- @LunaEatsTuna: All done! I did leave the gameplay dev info where it was, because I'd done that with other articles but also if it's moved it may confuse the reader, as we haven't introduced what the Lifeline ability is for example.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- I agree with that explanation. Nice work on the changes! Happy now to pass for GA status. Congrats! ❧ LunaEatsTuna (talk), proudly editing since 2018 (and just editing since 2017) – posted at 22:10, 26 April 2026 (UTC)
- @LunaEatsTuna: All done! I did leave the gameplay dev info where it was, because I'd done that with other articles but also if it's moved it may confuse the reader, as we haven't introduced what the Lifeline ability is for example.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- GA-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- GA-Class video game characters articles
- Low-importance video game characters articles
- Video game characters task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
