Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22c84de4b35a594

Jump to content

Talk:Jet Kiss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Brianhe in topic Aircraft type

A-4s flew in Seattle

[edit]

The aircraft once flew from Sand Point Naval Air Station (now Magnuson Park): . Perhaps a better source could be found, and this incorporated in the article. - Brianhe (talk) 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

SPS with information

[edit]

A Skyhawk fansite has some details about the two that were chosen for this piece. Trying to find some reliable sources to back this up, especially the "one of the earliest" claim. SounderBruce 03:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Aircraft type

[edit]

The A-4 Skyhawk was an attack aircraft, not a fighter. It sounds silly to describe it as a fighter. --John (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure I'd be pedantic about that for several reasons. First, the readers of this article probably have no idea what an attack aircraft is, but a fighter is universally known. Second, the aircraft carried 20 mm cannon and AAMs and today might be called an F/A. Third, Fighter aircraft#Terminology describes how the terms are kind of arbitrary especially now considering aircraft like the F-117 deliberately misnamed. So, bottom line, no harm really in calling it a fighter. - Brianhe (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply