Talk:Jet Kiss
Add topic| Jet Kiss has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 9, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jet Kiss article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
A fact from Jet Kiss appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 September 2016, and was viewed approximately 8,231 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A-4s flew in Seattle
[edit]The aircraft once flew from Sand Point Naval Air Station (now Magnuson Park): . Perhaps a better source could be found, and this incorporated in the article. - Brianhe (talk) 08:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
SPS with information
[edit]A Skyhawk fansite has some details about the two that were chosen for this piece. Trying to find some reliable sources to back this up, especially the "one of the earliest" claim. SounderBruce 03:05, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Aircraft type
[edit]The A-4 Skyhawk was an attack aircraft, not a fighter. It sounds silly to describe it as a fighter. --John (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I'd be pedantic about that for several reasons. First, the readers of this article probably have no idea what an attack aircraft is, but a fighter is universally known. Second, the aircraft carried 20 mm cannon and AAMs and today might be called an F/A. Third, Fighter aircraft#Terminology describes how the terms are kind of arbitrary especially now considering aircraft like the F-117 deliberately misnamed. So, bottom line, no harm really in calling it a fighter. - Brianhe (talk) 22:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- GA-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class sculpture articles
- WikiProject Sculpture articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- GA-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class Visual arts articles
- GA-Class public art articles
- Public art articles
- WikiProject Visual arts articles




