Talk:Jessica Pfund

Sensitive information removal

Hello. This information is about me and it is personal. Please remove it from my wiki page or delete my Wikipedia page all together. I do not give permission to use this information. Skate4gold (talk) 19:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Edit Request. Subject of Article

I am the subject of the article. I regard myself as a non-notable, private person. I request that the description about the doping violations be removed from the top of the page and kept in the drop down link lower down on the page. I also request the words “cocaine and its metabolites, and amphetamine” be replaced with “banned substances”. This is sensitive information that is causing harm and threats in the subjects every day life. Putting this information at the top of the page is not in the encyclopedia’s best interest and is indeed just a Headline of a Press Release. It is not part of the subject’s biography and is not notable for a human being’s Wiki page, let alone the very top. It is exposing the worst parts of this subject rather than the important life they have lived. I believe exposing information that came from an article meant for a small circle of people to read, can deeply hurt the subject, rather than talking about who the subject really is and what they have accomplished. It is something that happened to the subject, but has no impact on the previous biography of the subject. I, as the subject, request this edit for my safety, my family’s reputation, my career, and my mental health. Thank you. Skate4gold (talk) 02:10, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

• What I think should be changed: Change “Amphetamine and Cocaine” to “banned substances” in the Subheading and description of article subject.
• Why it should be changed: The details are irrelevant to the articles heading and repetitive in the article Jessica Pfund. The Category “Doping” includes these details already and links to the full published article where details are also included. It is not in the encyclopedia’s best interest to start the article with such details. Instead leave details to be found in citation links under proper category.”
• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): [15] [16] has specific information regarding [banned substances] to be found.

Skate4gold (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

References

Partially  Done. I condensed this in the lede, but I think it is appropriate detail in the body of the article. _signed, Willondon (talk) 17:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Request to remove suspension from lead and condense career section

I am the subject of this article and have a conflict of interest, so I am requesting neutral editors review the wording regarding the anti-doping suspension.

The suspension is currently mentioned in the lead and described in the “Career” section with extensive procedural, medical, and financial information. While the suspension is a matter of record and I am not disputing that it occurred, the current wording reads more like a disciplinary ruling than a biographical summary.

Wikipedia biographies typically summarize such events briefly rather than including detailed substance lists, administrative procedures, or cost breakdowns.

I am requesting that the anti-doping matter be: •Removing this material from the lead section entirely. •Condensing the material in the Career section to a brief, neutral statement such as: “In 2023, she received a four-year suspension for an anti-doping rule violation.”

This would maintain accuracy while improving proportionality, tone, and encyclopedic style. ~2026-79351-2 (talk) 08:31, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Partially  Done. I agree that the coverage was disportionate, and I have further condense the lede and trimmed excessive trim from the career section.

Fiske (talk) 14:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)