Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a40690091b7f612b

Jump to content

Talk:Jayanta Bose

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 days ago by Archiwee in topic Clarification for AI-generation tag

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as unreviewed LLM content, because... (your reason here) --Archiwee (talk) 12:05, 6 September 2026 (UTC) I wrote this article based on genuine Indian classical music records and reviews. I am immediately removing the disputed citations and replacing them with fully accessible, verifiable secondary sources. Please allow me time to update the references.Reply

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as unreviewed LLM content, because... (your reason here) --Archiwee (talk) 12:40, 6 September 2026 (UTC) I have updated and audited the references across the article. The citations previously flagged as unverifiable were legitimate regional news articles (such as The Telegraph India) that were inaccessible to overseas reviewers due to geo-blocking, bot-mitigation firewalls, or dynamic URL rerouting. Please consider reviewing the changes.Reply

Clarification for AI-generation tag

[edit]

Hi, all.

I’ve noticed that my article often gets tagged for AI-usage. I have written the entire article myself, with reliable 3rd party verified sources as citations. I only take the help of AI models for research purposes, and even then, I verify each source myself before adding them to the article. I would appreciate more specific criticisms, regarding which part of the text feels AI-generated and why. I have done my best to keep the language as factual and neutral as possible, and have tried to back up every single claim with reliable sources as citations. Please tell me why this article gets tagged for AI-use specifically, so that i can actually work on improving the article.

Thank you! Archiwee (talk) 14:04, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

..., I verify each source myself before adding them to the article.

Then how come that in Diff/1373337164, reference nr. 1 returned a 404 not found error? That reference was added in Diff/1373208139, more than a day earlier. ‑‑gurkubondinn 23:53, 15 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
That was a genuine error from my part and i would like to apologize for that. However it really was a genuine page from The Telegraph india online. Archiwee (talk) 20:54, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
The problem likely arose due to a humble human error from my side. Actually, looking back, the automatic citation generations was not working for some reason for the specific link, so i used the manual mode. Some human error must have occurred from my side, leading to it returning to a 404 error. Archiwee (talk) 21:13, 16 September 2026 (UTC)Reply