Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess: newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Latest comment: 9 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@HenrikHolen I don't have a problem with leaving out a source supporting USA Powerlifting's position (as long as it's not back to "no credible scientific evidence...") but can you please not accuse me of selectively citing a secondary source? The British Journal of Sports Medicine is a peer-reviewed medical journal, and the article I cited accurately represents the study's findings without bias or commentary. If you want to be thorough in including the source's claims, that transgender women have higher grip strength but a lower vertical leap than cisgender women, that would be acceptable. Thank you. Archon785 (talk) 12:26, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
It was not my intent to accuse you of impropriety, but I hope we can agree that including only the parts of the secondary source which substantiate USA powerlifting's claims and not the parts which appear to contradict them is not best practice. I think in its current state, the paragraph is fine, and I would leave it as is.
Content related to whether or not transgender women have a physiological advantage might be best placed in the "Transgender people in sports" article rather than dedicating a paragraph to it on the page of every trans athlete. HenrikHolen (talk) 13:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm fine with how it's currently worded. Just the way it was before, saying there was no credible scientific evidence of an advantage, was not acceptable. Archon785 (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, would it at all be appropriate to include her deadname in the article? When she curled, it was pre-transition, so she competed under her dead name, which might make it appropriate to include for encyclopedic purposes. However, I do understand this is a sensitive issue, and don't want to cross any lines. Additionally, it might be helpful to include a link to this article from the disambiguation page that is her deadname, but again, not sure if it's inappropriate or not.-- Earl Andrew - talk16:42, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
She transitioned in 2015 I believe, and I don't believe she would have met WP:NATHLETE at that time (most of her coverage is from power lifting afterwards and the lawsuit). I would be opposed to including it without more evidence of significant pre-2015 coverage. Sophisticatedevening(talk)16:50, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
According to MOS:GENDERIDUnless a living transgender or non-binary person was notable under a former name, the former name should not appear in any page (including questions, lists, redirects, disambiguation pages, category names, templates, etc.), even if reliable sourcing exists. So I don't think that would be a good idea either. Sophisticatedevening(talk)17:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
