Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a237f825da95cf57

Jump to content

Talk:Jason Clare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Timeshift9 in topic Neutral statement

Untitled

[edit]

He is the endorsed Labor candidate for one of the safest Labor seats in Australia, and will certainly be elected whenever the election is held. This article shouldn't need any further justification than that. Intelligent Mr Toad 09:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Neutral statement

[edit]

I have been reading Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View article, and it seems to me that the following sentence is holding a stance that isn't supported by a third party. Also, from my reading of the site guidelines, this would also make it original research. The sentence is:

"Since Blaxland is regarded as a safe Labor seat, Clare was almost certain to be elected in the 2007 federal election"

Would it be better to say that "Clare won the safe Labor seat of Blaxland in the 2007 Federal election"? This would state the facts accurately and not assume a supposition. - Letsbefiends (talk) 11:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

As nobody has objected for several days, I have made the change. - Letsbefiends (talk) 01:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
That would be because it isn't a controversial change. Timeshift (talk) 06:59, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your comment. I thought as you had reverted my previous talk page comments that I might get reverted and I didn't want to cause problems on this article. - Letsbefiends (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
That is because one is not a suitable contribution, the other is. Timeshift (talk) 23:40, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply