Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a241af39ab9097fe

Jump to content

Talk:James Challis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Distelfinck in topic Challis's interest in acoustics?

Challis's interest in acoustics?

[edit]

Henry Margenau, in his introduction to the Dover edition of On the Sensations of Tone, states:

"Helmhotz' interest in acoustics was aroused for the first time in 1852, apparently by mathematical errors in the publications of Challis, which he corrected."

There is no entry for "Challis" in my 1922 Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians nor in the index of Benade's Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics. The only Challis in Wikipedia in James Challis. Is it he? Cutler 22:57, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

... and there is no other Challis in the Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Margenau was a respected historian of science so would certainly have disambiguated any obscure reference. It must be he.Cutler 19:15, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cutler, Helmholtz cites a "J Challis". When you look up the first citation it turns out it's the "Plumian Professor of Astronomy and Experimental Philisophy", so yea, Helmholtz is indeed citing the subject of this Wikipedia article. --Distelfinck (talk) 18:48, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Challis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Not discovering Neptune?

[edit]

Not discovering Neptune? Why do you write that? Just DON'T write this. 2001:18C0:927:8F00:78CE:37C0:40A:4DD9 (talk) 14:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Could you be more specific and tell us the reason we shouldn't say it? --Distelfinck (talk) 10:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply