Talk:James Cameron/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: HAL333 (talk · contribs) 16:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

I'm an admirer of Cameron, hopefully it'll be a good article. ~ HAL333 16:21, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): Y b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): Y (My only thought is that you remove the references from the lede per MOS:LEADCITE) b (citations to reliable sources): Y c (OR): Y d (copyvio and plagiarism): Y It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): {[Check mark}} b (focused): Y It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: Y It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: Y It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): Y b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Y
Overall: Great Job on the article! Pass/Fail: