Talk:Jake Bergey
Add topic| Jake Bergey has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 6, 2025. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Jake Bergey was drafted by the Boston Blazers before being traded back to the Philadelphia Wings, twice? | ||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jake Bergey/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 23:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 14:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
- Could you find his full name anywhere?
- Didn't see it anywhere.
- "The son of NFL player Bill Bergey, Jake Bergey" remove Jake
- Done.
- "was a standout football and lacrosse player" lacrosse already linked earlier in lead
- Cut link.
- "Following his graduation from college, Bergey joined the Philadelphia Wings of the National Lacrosse League (NLL) in 1998" Linked earlier in lead. Also change to just NLL.
- Done.
- Is there a link for forward in the infobox?
- Most lacrosse positions don't have articles for some reason, nor do I see any other article discussing the position...
- "having been selected in the league's 1997 draft" link 1997 NLL Draft.
- Done (wow, an uppercase Draft!)
- Does the lacrosse infobox really not list years for teams? The hockey infobox doesn't do that either. That's messed up.
- I added a link for NLL draft at the lacrosse infobox.
- Where does his height and weight come from in the infobox?
- Added a ref.
- Stats tables aren't sourced.
- Added citations.
- I fixed some capitalization issues in the stats tables.
- Please add year links to the stat tables (and team links also if there are any).
- Done.
- What does LB and PIM mean in the stat tables? Can you add tooltips? Ex: {{tooltip|TKO|technical knockout}
- Added.
- What's 2ptG mean? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Two-point goals, apparently. Added a tooltip for it. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- What's 2ptG mean? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- Added.
- I added cats for the MLL teams.
- "play the attack position, he was switched to midfield after joining" Are there links for those or a glossary of lacrosse or something?
- Those two actually do have links, but not the position of forward discussed above for some reason.
- "In his freshman year" freshman already linked earlier
- Done.
- "In September 1997, Bergey was selected by the Philadelphia Wings in the National Lacrosse League (NLL) draft" link 1997 NLL Draft.
- Linked.
- "He debuted for the Bayhawks in the ninth game of the season, making one shot, and then was inactive the rest of the year" do you know why he was inactive?
- No, the media guide just says that he became inactive after that game.
- How did he play in two leagues at the same time? Were the NLL and MLL seasons at different times of year?
- Yes, clarified in the article.
- "He married to Heather Henry in December" remove to
- Done.
- His son is a college lacrosse player. His wife Heather also played in college.
- Added those details.
Spot checks
- Ref 4 looks good
- Ref 6
- "In football, he played as a defensive back and running back" He was a slotback as a sophomore and junior.
- Changed to "he played as a defensive back, running back and slotback".
- "was honorable mention All-American" I didn't see that in the source?
- Looks like I got that from ref 7 ("Bergey was an honorable-mention All-American and first-team All-Stater ... playing football for his father at Tatnall.") so I added that ref for that statement.
- "In football, he played as a defensive back and running back" He was a slotback as a sophomore and junior.
- Ref 18 looks good
- Ref 28 looks good
- Ref 37 looks good
Nice work! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- @WikiOriginal-9: I think I addressed everything. BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- I replied above to something. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:16, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
- ... that Philadelphia Wings lacrosse player Jake Bergey was drafted by the Boston Blazers before being traded back to the Wings, then was drafted again by Boston, before being traded back again?
- Source: refs 29 to 34
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Ambam (gorilla) & Template:Did you know nominations/Ida Macalpine
- Comment: To do QPQs within two days.
BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:50, 7 November 2025 (UTC).
Closing as incomplete per WP:QPQ (" A nomination which doesn't include a QPQ (and is not from an exempt nominator) may be closed as "incomplete" without warning.") — Preceding unsigned comment added by RoySmith (talk • contribs) 00:04, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'd appreciate it if I could have more than one hour to do six QPQs... BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- "A QPQ" has been completed. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: Moving forward, to prevent cases of your nominations being in danger of being closed for a lack of QPQ, I suggest you do your QPQs before making the nominations. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I will be reviewing this, but RoySmith and Narutolovehinata5, this is becoming pointy. The intent of the "rule" is to keep things moving smoothly at QPQ. Nowhere does it say you have to complete QPQ prior to listing a nomination, and having a nomination open for one hour without QPQ is not damaging to DYK, nor does it impact any reviewers or other editors. If a nom has been open for a day, without any comment by the nominator (or for example, one QPQ being complete and the nominator noting they are working on the second), then go ahead and close it. Otherwise this is getting disruptive. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:17, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: Moving forward, to prevent cases of your nominations being in danger of being closed for a lack of QPQ, I suggest you do your QPQs before making the nominations. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- "A QPQ" has been completed. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'd appreciate it if I could have more than one hour to do six QPQs... BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
article is long enough, recently promoted to GA, and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ is complete. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:22, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Did you know nominations/Trouble (comics), reviewer giving someone a 24-hour notice to complete QPQ. Not sure what the crazy hurry is to quick fail Beanie's noms after 1 hour, other than to make a point. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:32, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Delaware articles
- Low-importance Delaware articles
- WikiProject Delaware articles
- GA-Class Kentucky articles
- Low-importance Kentucky articles
- WikiProject Kentucky articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class lacrosse articles
- Low-importance lacrosse articles
- GA-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles
- GA-Class Philadelphia articles
- Low-importance Philadelphia articles


