Talk:Jahanpanah

Category:Sultanates vs. Category:Delhi Sultanate

Category:Delhi Sultanate is itself a category within Category:Sultanates. — Robert Greer (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jahanpanah/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Failed "good article" nomination

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of August 15, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass; Rather good, perhaps on FA, the lead could use a bit of servicing.

2. Factually accurate?: Fail, for now. Improve references in the sections: "Other notable structures" and "Bijay Mandal."

Mostly done

3. Broad in coverage?: Fail, for now. I'd like a major improvement to the etymology section.

But there isn't anything more - The name has such a simple, obvious andunarguable origin. Hometech (talk) 10:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass A bit much. Cut a few.

Removed some

The article is a pass if these changes are made.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 04:10, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

GA re-review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Okay if there is not much etymology.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The improvements make this article a passed GA. Good job editors.- The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 17:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jahanpanah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050831215230/http://www.indiaclub.com:80/shop/SearchResults.asp?ProdStock=8780 to http://www.indiaclub.com/Shop/SearchResults.asp?ProdStock=8780

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Jahanpanah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080102031657/http://india.mapsofindia.com:80/culture/monuments/adilabad-fort.html to http://india.mapsofindia.com/culture/monuments/adilabad-fort.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080507065036/http://archnet.org:80/library/documents/one-document.jsp?document_id=3687 to http://archnet.org/library/documents/one-document.jsp?document_id=3687
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080507065036/http://archnet.org:80/library/documents/one-document.jsp?document_id=3687 to http://archnet.org/library/documents/one-document.jsp?document_id=3687
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006201656/http://www.vedamsbooks.com/no43813.htm to https://www.vedamsbooks.com/no43813.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Jahanpanah

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. TompaDompa (talk) 21:19, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Several unreferenced paragraphs (the first paragraphs of subsections Begumpur Mosque and Bijay Mandal, and the second paragraph of section Other notable structures) and sentences. Where did "The tomb building, elevated on twelve columns with perforated screens on the façade, features a large dome set on a sixteen-faced drum. The ceiling is adorned with intricate plaster medallions on the spandrels of the arches, while the parapets display a merlon design" come from?

There is also egregiously non-neutral prose, much of which is probably LLM-generated:

Kalu Sarai Masjid ... urgently requires restoration due to its status as a heritage monument

Today, remnants of the city lie scattered across Begumpur village, serving as a silent testament to its ancient glory

A majestic building in the heart of the city with pride of place played a pivotal role in serving as a madrasa

randFreeman 14:46, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.