Talk:JD Decompiler

Would you see this in a traditional encyclopedia??

Hi, I think the user who created this article is more likely to be the developer of JD, but I'm not sure. I'll tell you anyway why I've put these "multiple issues" template in the article (DON'T TRY TO REMOVE THEM), I've read the article carefully before adding the notices, I've seen the only thing this article tells is "what is JD" and the sample source code. In the first place, Wikipedia is not an advertising network, is an encyclopedia WP:SOAP, in the last place you do not cited any sources (not even non-independent sources) WP:V. Sorry but this article won't last too much time, an admin will check the article and will thank me.

UPDATE: I've found this article through Help > Wikipedia, so you are more likely to be the developer (but I can't be 100% sure). TheWikiContributor (talk) 00:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

• The version that was just a simple introduction followed by a bunch of code was introduced on 6 November 2017, so I have reverted to the version before that. It's poorly sourced and may not pass notability, but I don't see the content of the stable version as being unambiguously promotional. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)