Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a227c1b42a2bcc78

Jump to content

Talk:Isograd

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Musiconeologist in topic Lines on maps of metamorphic terranes

Plane of . . .

[edit]

I'm not a geologist, but in the opening definition "surface" seems more likely than "plane". Normally in scientific usage a plane is flat. Musiconeologist (talk) 17:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Update: The OED definition uses surface as do all its examples, so I've now changed it.Musiconeologist (talk) 18:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

References in introduction

[edit]

I've made the first paragraph more explanatory using information from the articles for the various technical terms it uses. But I had to keep its three references together at the end, as I don't have access to the books. I think it would be sensible to check whether they can now be moved to the specific points where they're relevant. Musiconeologist (talk) 22:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lines on maps of metamorphic terranes

[edit]

There are several issues with the second paragraph of the article as it stands. Safely fixing them requires more knowledge of geology than I have.

  • Metamorphic terranes: This needs a link, but the Terrane article appears to be about a different usage of the term so either is not the appropriate place, or needs clarifying so that it is.
  • (or landscapes underlain by metamorphic rocks): unclear whether this is an explanation (that is, . . .) or an alternative (or of . . .)
  • An isograd has just been defined as a surface, but now refers to a line.
  • the first occurrence of garnet is confusing. First in what respect? Presumably as one moves across the map into a region containing garnet, and then other index minerals, but on first reading I imagined moving vertically into the rock until one finds garnet, then somehow relating this to a line on the map. I think something like the garnet isograd represents the boundary between areas which do and do not contain garnet would be better.

I'd like to add a sentence immediately after the existing definition similar to one of the following, but worded so as to accurately represent the usage within geology:

  • The line where this surface and the upper surface of the bedrock intersect is also commonly referred to as an isograd.
  • The line where this surface intersects a horizontal section through the rock is also commonly called an isograd.

Alternatively I could just trust the OED definition and change surface to surface or line in the first paragraph, though this would be slightly less specific about what the line on a map represents.

Musiconeologist (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply