Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a89c66e2bdf63

Jump to content

Talk:Isaiah 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Verses 4–21 section biased towards King James & Christian translation

[edit]

The use of NKHV for the translation in this section uses of "Lucifer", a proper noun, which is a Christian interpretation. The literal Hebrew is "morning star", often thought of as Venus. This is not an article on Christianity. The reader would need to carefully read the Lucifer article to understand the leap from "morning star" to "Venus" to the Latin masculine word for Venus: "Lucifer".

Suggest using NASB, most literal translation, which is "star of the morning". Footnote on verses can offer the Lucifer usage in Christian translations & link to Lucifer.

Also, in the first sentence, "secondary" is unclear. Who are the verses "primary applied to"? The subject of these verses doesn't seem to be clearly pointed to in this article. 1) The primary scholarly reference should be directly noted. The sentence requires a rewrite. Eturk001 (talk) 21:36, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply