Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2392f00edbcb87b

Jump to content

Talk:Iron fertilization

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Adumoul in topic Concerns section edition

DMS cloud mechanism critique

[edit]

The section, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_fertilization#Dimethyl_sulfide_and_clouds, doesn't discuss the possibility that increased cloud cover would also result in increased greenhouse gases, thus not only is it highly uncertain as to how much cooling would result, the effect may be a net positive feedback loop or net negative. In other words, the uncertainty band extends in both directions.—Jamesray1 (talk) 04:53, 19 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Iron Salt Aerosol content added

[edit]

I have added some new sections to this page with the following headings:-

  • Methods
    • Ship based deployment
    • Atmospheric sourcing
      • Iron Salt Aerosol

including information about an alternative to ship based deployment of iron fertilization of the ocean, i.e. atmospheric deployment and specifically the Iron Salt Aerosol method. I am in contact with the author of the paper and am involved in my spare time with voluntarily researching the Iron Salt Aerosol method. My involvement is unpaid and not commercially motivated.

Shalso (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

article saying it might not help

[edit]

I haven't read this carefully yet. Maybe someone else can figure out whether to use it. 2601:648:8202:96B0:E0CB:579B:1F5:84ED (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's right. It's not a feasible solution. I've added some sentences about that to the lead, also at ocean fertilization. More could be done to update this article and to make it clearer that it's basically a no-go. EMsmile (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
: Just something to note, the line "Research in the early 2020s suggested that it could only permanently sequester a small amount of carbon." links to a news article which never refers to any research done on Iron fertilisation. It only mentions that it and many other simpler solutions are considered moot. Consider removing or linking the sentence to a research article.[1]161.29.24.84 (talk) 09:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)User:PolarbearHugReply

References

removed further reading list

[edit]

I've taken out the "further reading list" as it was arbitrary, outdated, US-centric:

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2009). Scientific Synthesis of the Impacts of Ocean Fertilization on Marine Biodiversity. Montreal, Technical Series No. 45, 53 pages

Technique

[edit]

Context

[edit]

Debate

[edit]
  • Oschlies, A., W. Koeve, W. Rickels, and K. Rehdanz (2010). "Side effects and accounting aspects of hypothetical large-scale southern ocean iron fertilization" (PDF). Biogeosciences Discussions. 7 (2): 2949–2995. doi:10.5194/bgd-7-2949-2010.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • The Iron Shore Of Science Journalism
  • An Open Letter to the Marine Science Community: Has Personal Bias Derailed Science?
  • Canadian Fishing at the Grand Banks, Zebra Mussels, and Iron's Effect on Plankton: an example of plausible connections -Chris Yukna (Ecole des Mines, France)
  • Basu, Sourish (September 2007). "Oceangoing Iron: A venture to profit from a CO2-eating algae bloom riles scientists". Scientific American. Vol. 297, no. 4. Scientific American, Inc. (published October 2007). pp. 23–24. Retrieved 2008-08-04. Note: Only first two paragraphs are available free on-line EMsmile (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

more publications that I removed:

[edit]

Changing ocean processes

[edit]

Micronutrient iron and ocean productivity

[edit]

Ocean biomass carbon sequestration

[edit]

Ocean carbon cycle modeling

[edit]

Concerns section edition

[edit]

Corrected the HAB/SOFeX passage in the Concerns section. The previous text stated that SOFeX "demonstrated that iron fertilisation can lead to the rapid growth of harmful algae" — this overstates the finding. SOFeX documented growth of Pseudo-nitzschia, a genus that includes some HAB-capable species, but the relevant papers (Trick et al. 2010) explicitly noted no toxin production was observed and the ecological significance was uncertain. The passage as written also contradicted the article's own introduction, which correctly states no significant harmful side effects were observed across 13 trials. Hypoxic zone language qualified to reflect its theoretical status in open-ocean OIF contexts. Sources: Trick et al. 2010; NASEM 2021. Adumoul (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2026 (UTC)Reply