Talk:Invisible disability
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Invisible disability article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| Invisible disability was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 10, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education assignment: Disability, Communication and Visual Culture
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2023 and 12 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Wikifaedia (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Gkrolewski (talk) 15:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Perceived disability
[edit]I have just removed this from the article:
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 has been amended several times such that the definition of "handicapped" includes the statement, "any person who... (C) is regarded as having such an impairment".[1]
This particular defining point of "handicapped" puts the assessment of impairment in the hands of observers who may or may not regard others as having an impairment. For people with disabilities, invisible or not, this creates a space for discriminatory practices which stem from the observer's perception of who is disabled and who is not.
I've removed this because the second paragraph leads me to believe that whoever added this (which hopefully wasn't me... ;-) didn't quite understand it. This US law covers people with actual disabilities and people with perceived disabilities. The inclusion of non-disabled people who are incorrectly perceived to have a disability does not take anything away from people with invisible disabilities. Including more people does not "puts the assessment of impairment in the hands of observers" or "create a space for discriminatory practices". WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
References
- ↑ Pelka, Fred. The ABC-CLIO Companion to The Disability Rights Movement. CA: ABC-CLIO, 1997. p. 264
Wiki Education assignment: Disability, Justice and Advocacy
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2025 and 19 November 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sgrass2007, Chamber132 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Sluba, Victorriaaaa, Ssavian.
— Assignment last updated by Amora193 (talk) 04:42, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
1 in 5, 1 in 10
[edit]I'm just a passerby, but I noticed this and I thought I should mention it. I am not an editor and have no current wish to be one.
Early in the article, it mentions that 1 in 5 Americans suffered mental illness, which is counted as an invisible disability. In the next paragraph or so, it is also mentioned that 1 in 10 Americans suffer from invisible disabilities. Wouldn't the former fact impact the latter? If 1 in 5 Americans suffered mental illness, then wouldn't AT LEAST 1 in 5 Americans suffer from invisible disabilities?
I don't know. Maybe I've got this all wrong. I just thought I'd bring it up.
Cheers! ~2026-15367-41 (talk) 20:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I've been thinking about your interesting question. I don't think that having a mental illness (or any other medical condition) necessarily rises to the level of being disabled. Consequently, it would be possible to have 20% of people have a medical condition, and only 10% of them be disabled.
- But to know whether that's what's going on in this particular scenario, we'd have to look at the sources, or find some better ones. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:53, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Start-Class Disability articles
- WikiProject Disability articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class Autism articles
- Mid-importance Autism articles
- WikiProject Autism articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Low-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles