Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22113d2ad44365e

Jump to content

Talk:Inthemix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Stevene1919 in topic Possible AI use
[edit]

when junkee sold out, it closed the online websites like inthemix.com.au and fasterlounder.com.au which are linked in many articles. they all need updating to archived versions (wayback has them) Stevene1919 (talk) 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

sites may also be known as inthemix.junkee.com and fasterlouder.junkee.com or just on junkee.com

most versions redirect incorrectly to blah junkee.com/page so you'll need to go back pre `~2015

apparently they also briefly ran with an international version at inthemix.com that had some articles that had a international focus. Stevene1919 (talk) 15:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

notability of website

[edit]

@Alexandermcnabb this website was for nearly 20 years a large presence in the Australian dance music scene. many articles quote articles from it, also other brands under junkee such as fasterlouder until they folded it all into junkee, aged out of the scene and sold the company. if anything its content could be merged with that of junkee media and the current junkee has already been updated to reflect its current situation. although the junkee media brand is also owned by the same company. Stevene1919 (talk) 14:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Stevene1919 - it's really all about the sourcing. Notability on Wikipedia is defined as independent, significant coverage to pass Wikipedia:GNG, the general notability guideline. Additional to that, there is a further notability guideline, WP:NCORP that defines notability for commercial companies. Right now, there is arguably not enough coverage from reliable sources WP:RS to satisfy those guidelines. Basically, you're looking for sound evidence of lasting impact or importance... If you take a look at them there links, you might find 'em helpful in your search for better sources/coverage! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Alexandermcnabb i do understand the notability requirements of Wikipedia, its probably just a matter of time for me or others before the article can be improved. its currently archived by national library of Australia trove as a notable inclusion https://trove.nla.gov.au/ Stevene1919 (talk) 14:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Possible AI use

[edit]

Concerns have been raised previously by Andrew Gray about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged. Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:48, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

are you sure you are just not flagging all my articles? this one has been heavily edited to make sure it meets standards, its not ai generated. Stevene1919 (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply