Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23b87ecddd6c526

Jump to content

Talk:Interstate 37/GA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Holderca1 in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Little things... U.S. Route 281 in Texas doesn't appear to exist, although U.S. Route 281 (Texas) does. Also, convert old construction numbers for inflation.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    There is only one image for 143 miles of highway... maybe another one would be nice.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Good job! Rob (talk) 20:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

One question - why aren't there mileposts for I-37? The road seems pretty much fixed in place. Are mileposts just not available? Rob (talk) 23:19, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
They are the same as the exit numbers, so it would be redundant. --Holderca1 talk 23:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply