Talk:Internal Revenue Code section 183
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by EECavazos in topic Assessment comment
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tone banner
[edit]I removed the tone banner after editing some of the sentences of the article.EECavazos (talk) 02:32, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Internal Revenue Code section 183/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| == Class ==
Start class because this article needs sections on history and impact. Furthermore, some more references are needed.EECavazos (talk) 02:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC) == Priority == The hobby loss rule is pretty important to the nature of income and loss in the grand scheme of things so with an expansion in such sections as history and impact I can see this article's priority going to "mid". Until then this is more a low priority because it doesn't quite state is claim to a higher priority and it so far limits itself to just the US. The concept behind it though is quite essential to the concept of deductions and loss.EECavazos (talk) 02:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 02:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)