Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a6a9bba030555

Jump to content

Talk:Intermodal container

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Peter Horn in topic 9 ft 6+1⁄2 in high containers

Series 1

[edit]

The article is about ISO Series 1 containers (it redirects from ISO Series 1 containers), without indicating what 'Series 1' relates to. Are there other series, perhaps an update to the standards? If there are no other series, the article ought to indicate this. FreeFlow99 (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

9 ft 6+12 in high containers

[edit]

I have seen 9 ft 6+12 in (2,908 mm) high containers as well as 9 ft 6 in (2,896 mm). Peter Horn User talk 04:10, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

No one has answered me. Peter Horn User talk 20:02, 16 July 2025 (UTC)`Reply

Log cradle container

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Not merged. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:19, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Make Log cradle container a section of Intermodal container Peter Horn User talk 23:15, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why? The current structure seems to work as it is. Klbrain (talk) 22:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article issues and classification

[edit]
Greeting, Sometimes things happen. This article currently does not pass the B-class criteria. There is a Nov 2021 "This section does not cite any sources" tag and an inline "Citations needed" (Jan 2022) tag. These need addressing to circumvent article reassessment. The "See also" section seems bloated. Three links in the "External links" section, possibly four with consensus, but seven is too many per WP:LINKFARM and needs trimming per WP:ELPOINTS #3. -- Otr500 (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply