Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a235bb267e982c82

Jump to content

Talk:Interior gateway protocol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe mention that link state protocols can use an algorithm such as Dijkstra to calculate shortest paths? Cheesy

Unclear

[edit]

The second line of the summary states: "In contrast an exterior gateway protocol is for determining network reachability between autonomous systems (AS) and makes use of IGPs to resolve route within an AS." However, the first line does not define the use of IGP. If "the use of IGPs is to resolve routes within an autonomous system" then the article should say so explicitly in the first line or paragraph fo the summary.

Also, may we please have an example of its use and purpose? Stephen Charles Thompson (talk)

== Wrong link ==

The link near the beginning to exterior gateway protocol is not really correct as in the text it's a reference to the general class of exterior gateway protocols and there is no such page yet. Instead it points to the page for the specific protocol Exterior Gateway Protocol. Unfortunately the class of protocols and the specific protocol have the same name. -- Dougher (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC) exterior gateway protocol has been split into two pages which does help clarify things here.Reply

Explaining Naming

[edit]

The article does not explain the name. I remember when having my first contact with IGPs, I always wondered, why they are called "gateway" protocols and not routing protocols. Then I realized that their purpose is finding the most suitable gateway router that can deliver the packet to its destination.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C2:43F6:D400:4938:BCD9:113E:29D2 (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

A longstanding suggestion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computing/Computer_networking_task_force#Tasks suggested there was misplaced material in this article. I have moved this to Distance-vector routing protocol and Link-state routing protocol. Now this article is similar in scope to Exterior gateway protocol. It is possible both can be merged into Routing protocol but I don't see any urgency to this. ~Kvng (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

There really should be a single place that explains the EGP–IGP split, including the history (which none of these articles treat well), which is necessary for understanding why the split still exists. (Especially given the existence of data center networks that "route" Ethernet frames using BGP!) 207.180.169.36 (talk) 01:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply