Talk:Intelectin-2

Untitled

Should we delete this? A one sentence article is not useful. The intelectin page actually is covering the same information and provide better references to articles about this protein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwangkanont (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

I recommend a merge or redirect rather than a deletion, because a simple online search shows the protein obviously exists and is verifiable. There is in principle nothing wrong with such an article as this, but it may have been premature to create a standalone article. If or when this protein becomes independently notable. the redirect could be turned back into and article. Deletion should only be performed if there is no better course of action; please see the policy alternatives to deletion. --Mark viking (talk) 21:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)